🤔 Oral Answers to Questions
Commons Chamber
The Work and Pensions session focused on the government’s plans to reform Personal Independence Payments (PIP), sparking intense debate. Liz Kendall, the Secretary of State, emphasized a review of PIP assessments to ensure they meet current needs, starting this week with stakeholder consultations. Critics, including Imran Hussain, warned that proposed cuts could devastate disabled people’s lives, urging the government to reconsider and fund support through taxing the wealthy. The session also addressed broader welfare reforms aimed at supporting young people into work and tackling pensioner poverty, amidst concerns about the impact of benefit changes on vulnerable groups.
Summary
-
PIP Support and Review: The Secretary of State announced a review of the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessment process. This review aims to ensure that the system is fit for the future by working with disabled people, their organizations, and other stakeholders.
-
Concerns Over PIP Cuts: There is significant concern among MPs about proposed cuts to PIP, specifically the potential impact of the four-point rule on recipients. Some MPs urged the government to scrap these cuts and consider alternative funding methods, such as taxing the super-rich.
-
Employment Support for Disabled People: The government is focusing on supporting disabled people into employment, emphasizing that those who can work should be supported to do so, while those who cannot will be protected.
-
Sensitivity in PIP Assessments: There were calls for utmost care and sensitivity in any changes to PIP assessments, acknowledging the difficulties faced by people whose disabilities might not be immediately apparent.
-
PIP and Mental Health/Fluctuating Conditions: The need to update the PIP system to better account for mental health problems and fluctuating conditions was highlighted, recognizing changes in societal understanding since the introduction of PIP 13 years ago.
-
Consultation with Scotland: The government is working with devolved administrations, including Scotland, to ensure that changes to PIP work across the entire UK.
-
Economic Impact of PIP Changes: Concerns were raised about the economic impact of proposed PIP cuts on deprived communities, with the government clarifying that the changes would not be immediate and aiming to support those affected into employment.
-
Youth Employment in Makerfield: The government is launching a guarantee for young people aged 18-21 to ensure access to training, apprenticeships, or work, specifically targeting areas like Makerfield.
-
Support for Trades and Construction: There is an emphasis on supporting young people into trades and construction careers, with initiatives like construction foundation apprenticeships starting in August.
-
Youth Unemployment and the Pandemic: The Minister acknowledged the impact of the pandemic on young people and stressed the need for better opportunities, especially in sectors like hospitality.
-
Universal Credit for Young People: There was a call for the government to consider the lower rate of Universal Credit for young people, given the lack of guaranteed family support.
-
PIP Assessment Accuracy: The government is committed to improving the accuracy of PIP assessments through monitoring and transparency measures, including possibly recording assessments.
-
PIP Appeals and Costs: Concerns were raised about the high cost of PIP appeals and the success rate of these appeals, prompting the government to review the mandatory reconsideration process.
-
Impact on Adult Social Care: There are worries about the impact of changes to PIP on adult social care, with government officials asserting their aim to promote independence through employment support.
-
Pension Policies and Young People: Automatic enrollment has significantly increased young people’s participation in workplace pensions, but concerns about opting out due to economic pressures were raised.
-
Encouraging Investment in UK Infrastructure: There is a push for pension funds to invest more in UK infrastructure, aligning with young people’s interest in contributing to national development.
-
PIP Changes and Employment Impact: The government aims to move more PIP recipients into employment through enhanced employment support programs, though some disability organizations fear these changes could hinder employment opportunities.
-
Winter Fuel Payment Means-Testing: There was debate over the impact of means-testing the winter fuel payment on pensioner poverty, with the government defending its choices to fund other priorities like the state pension and NHS.
-
Tackling Poverty in Wales: The government is reviewing Universal Credit to address poverty in Wales, with measures like the fair repayment rate and youth guarantees seen as beneficial.
-
Get Britain Working Trailblazers: The government has launched several trailblazer programs to boost employment and economic growth, focusing on health, skills, and youth employment.
-
Access to Work Scheme Delays: The government is reforming the Access to Work scheme to address delays and better support people with disabilities in employment.
-
Repeated Reassessments for Severely Disabled: The government plans to ensure that those with severe lifelong conditions who will never be able to work are not subject to repeated reassessments.
-
Business Support and Job Creation: The government is working to improve stability and skills for businesses, aiming to enhance job creation and support for entrepreneurs.
-
Housing Costs and Local Housing Allowance: The government is reviewing local housing allowance rates to balance fiscal responsibilities and support for housing authorities.
-
Carer’s Allowance Overpayments: There is an ongoing independent review to address overpayment issues for carer’s allowance, aiming to implement changes based on its recommendations.
-
Regional Impact of Welfare Changes: MPs expressed concern over the specific regional impacts of welfare changes, calling for more local consultation and analysis.
-
Skills for Disabled People: The government is investing in employment support to help disabled people demonstrate their vocational and non-academic competencies and secure employment.
-
Wealth Tax and Public Services: Proposals for a wealth tax to fund public services and support a healthier, more productive workforce were discussed.
-
Public Sector Pensions and McCloud Judgment: The government is addressing the implementation of the McCloud judgment on public sector pensions to ensure fair treatment for affected workers.
-
Communication on PIP Changes: There is a push for better communication to reassure those who will never work again about the new PIP assessment processes.
-
Support for Disability Groups: The government is encouraged to help disability groups facing increased bank charges, ensuring they can continue their vital work.
Divisiveness
The transcript shows a moderate level of disagreement, warranting a rating of 2 out of 5. Several points of contention are apparent, primarily revolving around the proposed reforms to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) and other welfare changes. Here are some examples and explanations for the rating:
-
Disagreement on PIP Reforms: There is clear opposition to the proposed changes to PIP, particularly regarding the impact on disabled individuals. For instance, Imran Hussain (Bradford East) (Lab) criticizes the proposed cuts, mentioning the potential devastation of the ‘four-point rule’ and advocates for alternative funding by taxing the super-rich. This is in contrast to Secretary of State Liz Kendall’s response, which focuses on supporting disabled people into work and protecting those who cannot work, indicating a fundamental disagreement on the approach to disability benefits.
-
Concerns Over Assessment Accuracy: There are multiple instances where the accuracy of PIP assessments is questioned, such as by Robin Swann (South Antrim) (UUP), who references high successful appeal rates and considerable spending on appeals. This suggests dissatisfaction with the current system and apprehension about potential reforms exacerbating these issues.
-
Impact on Local Economies and Communities: Steve Darling (Torbay) (LD) raises the economic impact of PIP cuts on deprived communities, suggesting a disagreement with the government’s assessment of the consequences of these reforms. Liz Kendall responds by explaining that the changes are gradual and aimed at supporting employment, indicating a different perspective on the impact.
-
Opposition to Winter Fuel Payment Means-testing: Wendy Morton (Aldridge-Brownhills) (Con) criticizes the means-testing of winter fuel payments, arguing that it pushes more pensioners into poverty. The government’s stance, represented by Torsten Bell, defends the policy based on broader pensioner support initiatives, showcasing a significant policy disagreement.
-
Employment Support and Reforms: There is also disagreement on the effectiveness and approach of employment support and related reforms. For example, Peter Bedford (Mid Leicestershire) (Con) expresses concerns over the Employment Rights Bill’s impact on young people’s employment, which Alison McGovern counters by emphasizing the government’s efforts to better serve employers and young people.
Despite these disagreements, the overall tone of the session remains relatively civil and focused on policy impacts rather than personal attacks. The disagreements do not escalate into significant conflicts but instead highlight different perspectives and priorities within the policy debate, which justifies a moderate disagreement rating.