🏡 Construction Standards: New Build Homes

Westminster Hall

🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️

The parliamentary session focused on the urgent need to improve construction standards for new build homes across the UK. MPs shared distressing stories of constituents moving into new homes only to find numerous defects, from faulty boilers to sewage issues, highlighting systemic failures by developers like Harron Homes and Persimmon Homes. There was a strong consensus on the need for stricter regulations, better oversight, and a new homes ombudsman to ensure quality and provide redress when standards are not met. The government pledged to address these issues as part of their commitment to build 1.5 million homes, emphasizing both quantity and quality in housing development.

Summary

  • Debate Overview: The session focused on the construction standards of new build homes, emphasizing the need for quality, safety, and affordability in housing across the UK.

  • Quality Concerns: Several MPs shared experiences of constituents facing significant defects in their new homes, such as incorrect installations, damaged materials, and poor insulation. Examples include issues with boilers, baths, flooring, and windows.

  • Developer Accountability: There was strong consensus on the need for stricter regulations and oversight to ensure developers cannot compromise on quality for profit. Complaints about developers’ reluctance to fix issues in a timely manner were prevalent, with some suggesting that future planning applications from negligent developers should be rejected.

  • Government Initiatives: The Minister outlined the government’s commitment to building 1.5 million new homes, introducing a new homes ombudsman scheme, and implementing the future homes standard to enhance energy efficiency and safety.

  • Local Authority Role: The debate highlighted the importance of local councils in monitoring new developments and ensuring that infrastructure, like roads and sewers, meets adoptable standards. Some MPs criticized councils for failing to enforce these standards effectively.

  • Accessibility and Affordability: Calls were made for new homes to be accessible and adaptable, particularly for an ageing population. The need for affordable housing that meets high standards was also emphasized.

  • Environmental Considerations: Suggestions were made to make new homes zero-carbon ready, including the installation of solar panels and renewable energy solutions as standard.

  • Infrastructure and Community Impact: MPs stressed the need for new developments to be accompanied by adequate infrastructure, such as schools and GP surgeries, to avoid burdening existing communities and to create sustainable living environments.

Divisiveness

The session on construction standards for new build homes displayed minimal disagreement among participants. The discussion was characterized by a high level of consensus across party lines, with Members of Parliament (MPs) from various parties expressing similar concerns about poor construction quality and the need for improved standards and regulations. Here is a detailed explanation of the low level of disagreement observed during the session:

  1. Consensus on Poor Quality: Multiple MPs, regardless of party affiliation, shared similar stories about their constituents experiencing substandard construction in new homes. For instance, Michelle Welsh (Lab) and Robbie Moore (Con) both criticized Harron Homes for similar issues, and Lee Anderson (Reform) echoed these concerns with his experiences with Persimmon Homes. There was no contention about the existence of these issues.

  2. Agreement on Need for Better Regulations: MPs unanimously called for more stringent regulations and better oversight. Suggestions included a new homes ombudsman scheme, as mentioned by Michelle Welsh and supported by the Minister Rushanara Ali. No opposing views were presented against these proposals.

  3. Support for Government Initiatives: The Minister’s response was met with agreement and further calls for action rather than opposition. MPs such as Sam Carling (Lab) praised the government’s commitment to building 1.5 million new homes but stressed the need for quality, again showing alignment with the government’s goals and recognition of shared challenges.

  4. Cross-Party Endorsements: Throughout the session, there were numerous instances where MPs from different parties agreed with each other’s points. For example, John Lamont (Con) and Alison Bennett (LD) both agreed on the need for better broadband connectivity in new builds, and there was no dissent when these views were expressed.

  5. Absence of Conflict: The session did not feature any significant debates or opposing arguments. Even when issues such as local government responsibilities and planning frameworks were discussed, the tone remained constructive with no adversarial exchanges. MPs like Sarah Russell (Lab) and Robbie Moore (Con) discussed local authority challenges, but their discourse was focused on systemic issues rather than partisan disagreement.

  6. Shared Goal for Improvement: All MPs emphasized the importance of high-quality, accessible, and sustainable homes. This shared goal was evident in the contributions from Andrew Cooper (Lab), Steve Yemm (Lab), and David Simmonds (Con), who highlighted various aspects of quality that needed improvement but did not disagree on the fundamental objectives.

The overall tone of the session was collaborative and focused on finding solutions to common problems rather than highlighting differences. There were no instances of significant disagreement or conflict, leading to the conclusion that the level of disagreement in this session was minimal, warranting a rating of 1 out of 5.