đźš‘ Disabled People’s Access to Transport

Commons Chamber

🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️

The Transport Committee’s report “Access denied: rights versus reality in disabled people’s access to transport” reveals widespread failures in the UK’s transport system, leaving many disabled individuals unable to travel freely due to inaccessible stations, unreliable passenger assistance, and discriminatory practices. The report criticizes the gap between accessibility laws and their real-world application, urging a systemic change in mindset and stronger enforcement to make transport a true enabler rather than a barrier. MPs across parties expressed support for the report, sharing personal and constituent experiences and calling for practical solutions like better maintenance of existing facilities and clearer legal frameworks. The Committee recommends the establishment of a unified body to enforce accessibility standards across all transport modes, aiming to turn rights into reality for disabled people.

Summary

  • Report Publication: The Transport Committee released a report titled “Access denied: rights versus reality in disabled people’s access to transport,” focusing on the difficulties disabled people face in using transport networks in the UK.

  • Common Issues: Many disabled individuals report inaccessible rail stations, refusal of service by taxis due to assistance dogs, and unreliable passenger assistance at airports and on trains.

  • Impact on Daily Life: Around 60% of disabled respondents to the survey face problems on nearly every journey, and over a third avoid travel more than once a week due to anticipated complications or safety concerns, which severely impacts their ability to work, access healthcare, and socialize.

  • Legal Framework: Despite existing laws like the Equality Act 2010 and specific transport regulations, these are not effectively implemented, leading to a gap between policy and reality.

  • Government Strategy: In 2018, the government aimed for equal access for disabled people by 2030, but progress has been insufficient, contradicting the goal of the inclusive transport strategy.

  • Recommendations: The report calls for a change in mindset within the transport sector, better implementation of accessibility policies, and adequate training for staff. It suggests the formation of a new body to enforce standards across all transport modes.

  • Accountability and Enforcement: The report emphasizes the need for a more robust enforcement regime, a unified service to handle accessibility complaints, and a review of the current legal framework to ensure clearer rights and responsibilities.

  • Public Involvement: The Committee highlighted the crucial role of disabled people in shaping solutions and urged the government to respond to the report’s recommendations effectively.

  • Future Actions: The Committee will hold the government accountable for implementing the report’s suggestions to align transport access with the rights of disabled people.

Divisiveness

The session displays a very low level of disagreement, predominantly focusing on unity and agreement on the issue of disabled people’s access to transport. The statement by Ruth Cadbury, the Chair of the Transport Committee, is met with supportive and reinforcing questions from various Members of Parliament across different parties, indicating a consensus on the need for improved accessibility. The members who asked questions and provided comments generally expressed appreciation for the report and offered suggestions or emphasized points that are in alignment with the report’s recommendations. Specific examples of agreement include:

  1. Paul Kohler (Liberal Democrat) - He expresses support for the report and raises an issue about the Access for All programme, seeking assurance on future improvements, which is aligned with the report’s goals.

  2. Paulette Hamilton (Labour) - She praises the report and references Labour’s Great British Railways reform in a positive context, suggesting it could aid in implementing the report’s recommendations.

  3. Jeremy Corbyn (Independent) - He compliments the report and expresses a desire for specific actions (reopening ticket offices and improving underground accessibility), which aligns with the report’s critique of current transport accessibility.

  4. Laurence Turner (Labour) - He pays tribute to the Chair and supports her view on the need for clearer statutory guidance, aligning with the report’s recommendation to streamline and clarify laws and regulations.

  5. Luke Taylor (Liberal Democrat) - He supports the report and its suggestions for investment in maintaining and ensuring accessibility, aligning with the report’s broader goals.

  6. Alex Mayer (Labour) - He emphasizes the importance of addressing hidden disabilities, reinforcing the report’s comprehensive approach to accessibility issues.

  7. Andy Slaughter (Labour) - He supports the report and calls for action on specific local issues (Kew Bridge and Gunnersbury stations), which is in line with the report’s recommendations.

  8. Rachel Taylor (Labour) - She uses the report to support her local campaign and critiques past government actions, agreeing with the report’s call for immediate action.

  9. Florence Eshalomi (Labour/Co-op) - She supports the report and emphasizes enforcement and training, in alignment with the report’s suggestions for systemic changes.

  10. Daniel Francis (Labour) - He supports the report’s recommendations in the context of aviation and pushes for legislative changes, indicating agreement with the report’s broader call for action.

  11. Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour) - She congratulates the report and activists, showing agreement and reinforcing the importance of the report’s findings.

Throughout the session, all comments and questions are supportive of the report’s findings and recommendations without any expressed opposition or dissent, leading to the rating of 1 for disagreement.