🛡️ Speaker’s Statement

Commons Chamber

🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️

A security incident occurred on the parliamentary estate last Saturday, prompting an immediate response and a subsequent review ordered by Mr Speaker. The incident was resolved safely thanks to the efforts of those involved, and an individual has been charged. Mr Speaker emphasized that the safety of everyone on the estate is his top priority and assured that lessons will be learned from the review. Details about security measures will not be discussed in the Chamber, but concerns can be addressed directly to the director of parliamentary security.

Summary

  • Speaker’s Statement on Security Incident: The Speaker addressed a security incident that occurred on Saturday, emphasizing that the safety and security of everyone on the parliamentary estate is the top priority.
  • Review and Learning: A review of the incident has been ordered to ensure lessons are learned and future security can be improved.
  • Acknowledgment: The Speaker thanked those who helped manage and resolve the incident safely.
  • Legal Status: An individual has been charged in relation to the incident, and due to legal proceedings, the sub judice rule applies, prohibiting further discussion in the House.
  • Security Details: The Speaker reminded Members that security measures are not discussed in the Chamber.
  • Handling Concerns: Members and others with concerns about the incident are advised to contact the director of parliamentary security.
  • Open for Discussion: The Speaker is available to discuss these issues privately with colleagues but will not take points of order on this matter in the Chamber.

Divisiveness

The transcript provided shows a statement by the Speaker, Mr Speaker, regarding a security incident. There is no visible disagreement in the text; rather, it is a unilateral statement informing the House about the incident and the steps being taken in response. Mr Speaker mentions the priority of safety and security, the review of the incident, appreciation for those involved, and legal proceedings against an individual. The statement also includes procedural reminders about not discussing security details in the Chamber and how to raise concerns. Since the transcript does not include any dialogue or opposing viewpoints from other members, it indicates a low level of disagreement, hence the rating of 1. An example of the absence of disagreement is that the Speaker does not entertain ‘points of order’ on the matter, suggesting a lack of immediate contention or debate.