😟 Petition

Commons Chamber

🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️

Rebecca Smith presented a petition signed by over 100 constituents from Newton Ferrers and Noss Mayo, urging action to save their vital local pharmacy from potential closure due to soaring costs and an outdated NHS contract. The community is deeply concerned as the pharmacy, owned by Esi Kumurdzi, faces challenges like inadequate funding, rising operational costs, and staffing issues. The petition calls on the House of Commons to address these issues by assessing funding, reducing costs, and improving workforce retention before renegotiating the Community Pharmacy Contractual Framework. The closure threatens increased pressure on local GP surgeries and hospitals as residents seek alternative care.

Summary

  • Rebecca Smith presented a petition signed by over 100 residents from Newton Ferrers and Noss Mayo, concerned about the potential closure of Newton Ferrers Pharmacy.
  • The pharmacy, owned by Esi Kumurdzi, faces closure due to rising costs and an outdated NHS contract.
  • The petition highlights that community pharmacies are under pressure from inadequate funding, increased operating costs, staff recruitment and retention issues, and recent rises in National Insurance rates, which are expected to cost pharmacies an additional £50 million.
  • The closure of pharmacies increases pressure on GP surgeries and hospitals as patients seek alternative care.
  • The petition calls on the House of Commons to urge the Government to address these challenges by assessing funding, reducing operating costs, mitigating the impact of National Insurance rises, and improving workforce retention strategies before the renegotiation of the Community Pharmacy Contractual Framework.

Divisiveness

The transcript provided does not display any disagreement among the participants. It is a presentation of a petition by Rebecca Smith regarding the potential closure of Newton Ferrers Pharmacy. The content of the petition itself outlines the concerns of the constituents about the pharmacy’s situation but does not include any debate or opposition from other members of the parliament. The entire text is focused on conveying the urgency and the reasons behind the petition without any counterarguments or differing viewpoints being expressed. Therefore, the session is rated as having minimal disagreement, which warrants a score of 1 on a scale of 1 to 5.