🛡️ Defence and Security

Commons Chamber

🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️

In a significant parliamentary session, Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced a major boost to UK defence spending, aiming to reach 2.5% of GDP by 2027, and potentially 3% in the next Parliament, to counter the ongoing threats posed by Russia’s actions in Ukraine. This decision, marking the largest defence spending increase since the Cold War, will be funded by reducing the international development budget from 0.5% to 0.3% of GNI, a move that has sparked debate across the House. Starmer emphasized the need for a whole-society effort in national security, highlighting the importance of NATO, alliances with the US and Europe, and the necessity of deterrence to ensure lasting peace. The announcement received broad support but also raised concerns about the implications of cutting foreign aid, with MPs urging alternative funding methods and a focus on enhancing domestic defence capabilities and support for Ukraine.

Summary

  • The session began with concerns raised by the Speaker about the government’s redaction of a statement, highlighting issues of transparency and the potential leaking of information to the media. The Prime Minister assured the House that no statement was given to the media and promised an inquiry.

  • Prime Minister Keir Starmer addressed the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, emphasizing the UK’s commitment to supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression, which he described as a significant threat to European and UK security.

  • Starmer discussed his attendance at the NATO summit in Washington, reiterating the importance of NATO and the UK’s historic role within it. He stressed the need for unity and increased defense spending to meet current global challenges.

  • The Prime Minister announced a significant increase in UK defense spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027, and an ambition to reach 3% in the next Parliament. This increase includes additional funding for intelligence and security services, bringing total defense spending to 2.6%.

  • To fund the defense increase, the government will cut spending on overseas development assistance from 0.5% to 0.3% of GNI by 2027. The Prime Minister acknowledged the difficulty of this decision but stressed the priority of national security.

  • Discussions also focused on maintaining strong alliances with the US and Europe, highlighting the importance of the transatlantic relationship and the need to strengthen European defense.

  • The Prime Minister outlined plans for a comprehensive national security strategy to be published before the NATO summit in June, ensuring a coordinated approach across government to address current threats.

  • Several MPs expressed support for Ukraine, criticized recent US decisions at the UN, and questioned the funding strategy for increased defense spending, particularly the cuts to international development.

  • There were calls for better procurement practices in defense spending, with the Prime Minister recognizing the need for efficiency and reform, alongside commitments to support UK industries and jobs with the increased defense budget.

  • The session included questions on how the UK can enhance its defense capabilities in various domains, including cybersecurity, maritime security, and supporting the defense industry in regions like Northern Ireland.

  • The Prime Minister’s forthcoming meeting with President Trump was mentioned, with calls for him to advocate for continued US support for Ukraine and European security.

  • Concerns were raised about the impact of reduced aid on global poverty and stability, with some MPs urging the government to explore alternative funding sources for both defense and development.

  • The session concluded with a reiteration of the government’s commitment to using defense spending to bolster UK capabilities, support Ukraine, and ensure national and European security in an increasingly volatile world.

Divisiveness

The parliamentary session shows a moderate level of disagreement among members, primarily focused on the funding mechanisms for the proposed increase in defense spending. The Prime Minister announced an increase to 2.5% of GDP on defense by 2027, which was generally welcomed across the House. However, the decision to reduce the overseas development budget from 0.5% to 0.3% of GNI to fund this increase sparked disagreements, with some members expressing concerns about the moral implications and strategic impacts of such cuts. For instance, Stephen Flynn (Aberdeen South) (SNP) argued against cutting foreign aid, citing the Foreign Secretary’s previous stance that it would be a ‘big strategic mistake.’ Similarly, Liz Saville Roberts (Dwyfor Meirionnydd) (PC) criticized the cuts as a ‘massive strategic and moral mistake,’ emphasizing the importance of overseas aid in building peace and democracy. On the other hand, some supported the Prime Minister’s decision, like Mark Sewards (Leeds South West and Morley) (Labour), who argued for the necessity of prioritizing defense spending for national security despite the difficult decision on aid cuts. These dialogues highlight a clear division on financial priorities, though there is consensus on the need to increase defense spending and support for Ukraine. The disagreements are significant but did not escalate into heated confrontations, suggesting a moderate level of discord.