😡 Women’s State Pension Age (Ombudsman Report and Compensation Scheme)
Commons Chamber
Stephen Flynn introduced a Bill in Parliament demanding action on the WASPI women’s pension age issue, highlighting the urgent need for trust in politics and compensation for affected women born between 1950 and 1960. He criticized the government’s refusal to provide compensation despite acknowledging maladministration, pointing out their inconsistency with previous supportive statements from high-ranking officials. The Bill passed its first reading unanimously, with 105 votes in favor and none against, setting the stage for further debate and action. Flynn passionately argued that this is a defining issue that Parliament must address to restore public trust and deliver justice to the WASPI women.
Summary
-
Bill Proposal: Stephen Flynn, an SNP MP, proposed a bill to address the issues raised by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman regarding the state pension age changes, specifically for women born between April 6, 1950, and April 5, 1960.
-
WASPI Campaign: The bill aims to support the WASPI (Women Against State Pension Inequality) campaign, focusing on the injustice faced by women due to increases in the state pension age.
-
Trust in Politics: Flynn emphasized the need for trust in politics, highlighting the broken promises made to the WASPI women by various political figures and parties.
-
Gender Inequality: The proposal also acknowledges the broader context of gender inequality, noting that many of the affected women faced career and salary disadvantages due to their gender.
-
Ombudsman’s Findings: The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman found maladministration by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) in handling the pension age changes, suggesting that the DWP should be held accountable.
-
Government Response: Flynn criticized the government’s inadequate response to the ombudsman’s report, their refusal to discuss compensation, and their claim of financial constraints, despite their control over fiscal policy.
-
Public Support: The bill seeks to align with public sentiment, as there is strong support for compensating the WASPI women and rectifying the injustice.
-
Parliamentary Division: The bill passed its first reading unanimously with 105 votes in favor and no votes against, and it is scheduled for its second reading on March 7.
Divisiveness
The transcript of the parliamentary session regarding the Women’s State Pension Age (Ombudsman Report and Compensation Scheme) shows a minimal level of disagreement among the participants. The main speaker, Stephen Flynn, presents a detailed case for the need for a Bill to address the injustices faced by WASPI women, citing various supportive statements from high-profile politicians across different parties, including the Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, Chancellor of the Exchequer, and others.
There is no explicit disagreement recorded in the transcript. Stephen Flynn does mention a lack of action from the government after previous promises, but this is presented more as a critique of inaction rather than a direct confrontation or disagreement within the session itself. The evidence of this is seen when Flynn discusses the government’s response to the Ombudsman’s report and their subsequent decision not to award compensation, which he criticizes but does not lead to any recorded rebuttals or opposition in the session.
The vote at the end of the session shows unanimous support for the Bill to be brought forward, with 105 votes in favor and no opposing votes. This indicates a high level of consensus and minimal disagreement on the issue during the session. Therefore, the disagreement displayed is rated very low at 1 out of 5, due to the lack of any direct disagreement or opposition voiced during the session.