😔 Antisocial Behaviour: Hertfordshire

Commons Chamber

🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️

Residents of Hemel Hempstead are living in fear due to rampant antisocial behaviour, with drug dealing, aggressive dogs, and constant noise plaguing their neighbourhoods. The crime rate in the town has doubled over the past decade, a situation blamed on years of neglect by the previous Conservative government. The new Labour government is taking action with new initiatives like respect orders and a focus on restoring neighbourhood policing to tackle the issue head-on. Local heroes like Tom, a former emergency services worker, and young families like Cassy’s are desperately hoping for change as they continue to suffer from the chaos surrounding them.

Summary

  • Impact on Residents: Residents in Hemel Hempstead, such as Tom and Cassy, are living in fear due to drug dealing and antisocial behaviour, which severely impacts their quality of life and mental health. Tom, a former emergency service worker, and Cassy’s family are among those affected, facing issues like constant noise, intimidation, and unsafe environments.

  • Community-Wide Issues: Antisocial behaviour has broader implications, affecting not only residential areas but also local businesses. High street businesses in Hertfordshire reported similar problems, indicating a widespread issue that hinders community safety and economic activity.

  • Crime Statistics: Hemel Hempstead has been identified as having the highest rate of antisocial behaviour among major towns in Hertfordshire, with crime rates doubling between 2014 and 2024. The area is particularly vulnerable to drug-related exploitation, with a high number of children at risk.

  • Political Accountability: The debate highlighted criticism towards the Conservative administration’s management of the issue over 14 years, with accusations of neglect and resource cuts. The newly elected Labour MP for Hemel Hempstead emphasized working collaboratively to address the inherited problems.

  • Police and Community Efforts: Despite resource challenges, local police efforts like Operation Clear Hold Build and Operation Hotspot have been crucial in tackling antisocial behaviour. The role of neighbourhood policing was stressed, with commendations for officers working tirelessly to improve community safety.

  • Government Initiatives: The new Labour government introduced a “safer streets mission” as part of their plan to reduce crime and restore community confidence. This includes new tools like respect orders, aimed at curbing persistent offenders, and bolstering neighbourhood policing.

  • Interagency Collaboration: The need for improved cooperation between police, local councils, and housing associations was emphasized, pointing out the current gaps in response that leave residents feeling unsupported.

  • Focus on Youth and Drugs: Measures targeting youth at risk of exploitation through county lines and drug misuse were discussed, with efforts to close drug lines and provide support services to vulnerable children and young adults.

  • Retail and Public Safety: New legislative proposals were introduced to protect retail workers and address shoplifting, acknowledging the impact of antisocial behaviour on the business community.

Overall, the session focused on the urgent need to address the rising tide of antisocial behaviour in Hemel Hempstead, with a call for comprehensive strategies that involve government initiatives, increased policing, community collaboration, and targeted interventions for vulnerable populations.

Divisiveness

The session demonstrates moderate to high disagreement, primarily along party lines. Key points of contention include:

  1. Partisan blame-shifting: The Labour MP attributes rising antisocial behavior to 14 years of Conservative governance, citing police cuts and under-resourced councils. The Conservative MP counters by questioning Labour’s progress since taking power, creating a clear ideological divide.
  2. Policy effectiveness debates: Disagreement emerges over responsibility for addressing county lines crime, with the Conservative MP emphasizing cooperation with local authorities while the Labour MP highlights systemic underfunding.
  3. Differing priorities: While all speakers acknowledge antisocial behavior as a problem, the Labour speaker focuses on structural failures (police numbers, youth service cuts), while Conservative interventions emphasize individual responsibility and cross-agency collaboration.
  4. Ministerial response alignment: The Labour minister’s closing remarks reinforce party positions by criticizing previous Conservative policies while outlining new Labour initiatives, deepening the partisan divide rather than seeking consensus.

The session stops short of maximal disagreement (rating 5) because there’s some acknowledgment of shared goals (e.g., importance of policing), but sustained ideological clashes dominate the discourse.