🔍 Employment Rights Bill (Nineteeth sitting)

Public Bill Committees

🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️ 🌶️

The Employment Rights Bill session focused on technical amendments to ensure a smooth transition of enforcement functions from the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority to the new fair work agency. Key discussions revolved around maintaining legal continuity for ongoing cases and ensuring that critical powers, such as those related to modern slavery prevention, are effectively transferred to the Secretary of State. MPs expressed concerns about potential disruptions during the transition and questioned the need for numerous last-minute amendments, reflecting broader worries about the legislative process’s efficiency. The session highlighted the government’s commitment to enhancing worker protections and enforcement mechanisms, despite the challenges posed by the reorganization.

Summary

  • The Employment Rights Bill was discussed in the Public Bill Committee, focusing on amendments to ensure the continuity and effectiveness of enforcement mechanisms as functions transition to a new fair work agency.

  • Amendment 183 was proposed to ensure that the offence of possessing false or improperly obtained documents related to licences under the Gangmasters (Licensing) Act 2004 remains enforceable even after the abolition of the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority (GLAA).

  • Concerns were raised about the transition of GLAA staff to the new agency, with questions about potential redundancies and disruption during the transition. The Minister assured that no redundancies are anticipated but acknowledged that efficiencies might be identified as the agencies merge.

  • Amendments 102, 103, 104, 105, and 106 were technical, aimed at aligning existing legislation with the new structure of enforcement officers under the Bill, ensuring consistency and clarity.

  • Amendment 184 removed a subsection from the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, which was deemed unnecessary due to new provisions in the Bill on the appointment of fair work agency officers.

  • Amendments were made to ensure that the Independent Office for Police Conduct maintains oversight of enforcement officers using police powers, with no new powers or resources implied.

  • Amendment 190 extended the power to extract information from electronic devices for enforcement purposes under the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 to the new agency’s officers.

  • The Committee discussed the need for ensuring smooth transition and continuity in enforcement activities, with several amendments aimed at maintaining the effectiveness of legal processes and data handling during the changeover to the new agency.

  • Concerns were expressed about the high number of government amendments, attributed to the rapid introduction of the Bill, with calls for further scrutiny to ensure no critical elements are overlooked.

  • The session emphasized the importance of maintaining enforcement against modern slavery, with amendments designed to ensure that the relevant legal frameworks operate effectively under the new agency structure.

Divisiveness

The disagreement displayed in the session is moderate. The transcript shows a range of concerns and questions raised by Members, particularly from the Opposition, but these were largely technical in nature and focused on ensuring clarity and continuity within the Bill. For example, the amendments discussed were primarily about ensuring legal continuity and effective enforcement during the transition to the new fair work agency. While there were instances of critique, such as Sir Ashley Fox’s comment on the rushed nature of the Bill and the volume of Government amendments, these did not constitute significant opposition to the Bill’s core proposals. The Minister responded to the critiques and questions throughout the session, often reassuring Members about the intentions and operational continuity of the Bill. The disagreements were more about refining details rather than challenging the fundamental aspects of the legislation.